on the self in the net

reblog of slavin:

P012209PS-0541 (via The Official White House Photostream)
from my conclusion to Networked Publics: “Under network culture, then, the waning of the subject that began under postmodernism grows ever greater. But whereas under postmodernism, being was left in a free-floating fabric of emotional intensities, today it is found in the net. The Cartesian “I think therefore I am” dissolves in favor of an affirmation of existence through the network itself, a phantom individuality that escapes into the network, much as meaning escapes into the Derridean network of différance, words defined by other words, significance endlessly deferred in a ceaseless play of language. The division between the self and the net that Castells observed a decade ago is undone.”

Comments

are we defined by our google search?

are we the sum of our blogs [or lack thereof], comments, facebook posts, twitters, amazon wishlists, delicio.us links, flickr pics, web essays, linkedin cvs then? are we now defined by the result of a google search? isn't this another self, in most cases consciously constructed by us, and that looks back at us, just like we have constructed the facebook portraits that you wrote about a few weeks ago?

...and this level of consciousness varies [people are often surprised when you say 'i saw this of you on the web']. and has long memories [the self you constructed 10 years ago may still linger on a defunct website that may still pop out in google?]

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p></p><img> <span>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options